tiphareth
08-20-1998, 08:03 PM
...
>Spells and Magic. However, I have one qustion with S&M - Should
>Magicians be able to use the school of Universal Magic. In Spells and
i would be inclined to say no, and just allow magicians access to
high-level universal spells if they were originally part of divination or
illusion. you do have an argument for giving them all universals, though,
so i guess it's a matter of opinion. if you want to take the time, you
could rule on a case-by-case and spell-by-spell basis.
>Some of this spells appear to be included as they don't fit elsewhere
>(although I would put Enchant an Item in the Enchantment/Charm School).
the rationale for this was to allow all mages (ie evokers, necromancers?)
the ability to create magical items, regardless of sphere access. i don't
think it really makes sense for magicians to be able to do so, though,
otherwise there would be a lot more magic in cerilia than there is.
all my 2c of course and should be taken with a grain of salt =)
cheers
- -nick
>Spells and Magic. However, I have one qustion with S&M - Should
>Magicians be able to use the school of Universal Magic. In Spells and
i would be inclined to say no, and just allow magicians access to
high-level universal spells if they were originally part of divination or
illusion. you do have an argument for giving them all universals, though,
so i guess it's a matter of opinion. if you want to take the time, you
could rule on a case-by-case and spell-by-spell basis.
>Some of this spells appear to be included as they don't fit elsewhere
>(although I would put Enchant an Item in the Enchantment/Charm School).
the rationale for this was to allow all mages (ie evokers, necromancers?)
the ability to create magical items, regardless of sphere access. i don't
think it really makes sense for magicians to be able to do so, though,
otherwise there would be a lot more magic in cerilia than there is.
all my 2c of course and should be taken with a grain of salt =)
cheers
- -nick