Trizt
12-19-1997, 12:44 AM
On 18-Dec-97, DKEvermore (DKEvermore@aol.com) wrote about Re: SV: [BIRTHRIGHT]
- - Realm Spells, Domain action, Elves:
- ->In a message dated 97-12-17 14:21:28 EST, you write:
- ->> Why not let elves have there Wizards cast investiture as a wizard realm
- ->> spel. That way we solve the problem about elven investiture without
- ->> making new domain actions. Although the elven inability to investiture
- ->> would be a rather good
- ->This question is handled quite nicely in the BoP... I rather like the rule
- ->myself, and recommend checking out this Cerilian priest's bible.
Could someone shortly describe this "rule" for us who hasn't seen the damned
BoP?
//Trizt of Ward^RITE
-
- - Realm Spells, Domain action, Elves:
- ->In a message dated 97-12-17 14:21:28 EST, you write:
- ->> Why not let elves have there Wizards cast investiture as a wizard realm
- ->> spel. That way we solve the problem about elven investiture without
- ->> making new domain actions. Although the elven inability to investiture
- ->> would be a rather good
- ->This question is handled quite nicely in the BoP... I rather like the rule
- ->myself, and recommend checking out this Cerilian priest's bible.
Could someone shortly describe this "rule" for us who hasn't seen the damned
BoP?
//Trizt of Ward^RITE
-