PDA

View Full Version : Proposal: an alternative bloodline system

03-20-2003, 05:33 AM
I'll upload a .doc version of this to my lagtastic website at
www.geocities.com/lordshade. The version in this email won't contain
footnotes, which is where I note a lot of important info.

I tried to email this to the list, but it bounced because of length.

Please feel free to rip this to shreds!

------------------

An alternative method to determine bloodline and abilities. Please remember
that this a very rough first draft, not playtested at all, and written with
a lot of recent discussion about bloodlines in mind.

I propose this system as an alternative to the one presented in the BRCS
0.0 Draft. The system is designed with a number of things in mind: game
balance, simplicity of use, preservation of the original rules, and
addressing major problems. The system tries to give players and DMs a lot
of options to decide how they want to do things in their own game.

I make a very important distinction in this system between

Here's how the system works.

tell you whether your campaign is using a point-buy system or rolling=
system.
2. Choose race.
3. After consulting the DM, choose whether your character will be a
commoner or a scion.
4. If your character is a commoner, continue with the character creation
process as normal.
whether your campaign is using a point-buy system for bloodlines or a
random determination system.
6. If your campaign is using random determination for bloodlines, consult
the tables in the 2e Birthright Rulebook. After rolling d100, determine
your bloodline strength. Use the table on p.34 of the BRCS Draft to
the remaining characteristics of your bloodline.
7. If your campaign is using the point-buy system for bloodlines, refer to
the following table:

The average bloodline score, using Table 10 on p. 20 of the Birthright
Rulebook, is 19.7. Math: .25(10)+.4(17.5)+.3(28)+.05(36) =3D 19.7. From this=
,
I've decided that the average point buy result for this system should be a
minor or major bloodline in the 18-21 range.

The default number of points which you have to spend is 20. Your DM may
decide to increase or decrease the number of points you get for a bloodline
point buy in your campaign. You can spend points on the following things:

" Each point you spend gets you 1 point of bloodline score.
" Pick a derivation. Alternatively, your DM may decide to determine
derivation randomly using the table on p.34 of the BRCS Draft.
" Consult the following table to see how many blood abilities are available
in your character's bloodline. These abilities are not useable at the
beginning of play; your character must learn to use them (covered below).
You may choose these yourself, or they may be determined randomly, at the
DMs discretion.

Score Abilities
1-10 None
11-19 1 Minor
20-28 2 Minor
29-35 1 Minor, 1 Major
36-42 2 Minor, 1 Major
43-50 1 Minor, 1 Major, 1 Great
51-60 2 Minor, 1 Major, 1 Great
61-70 1 Minor, 2 Major, 1 Great
71-80 2 Minor, 2 Major, 1 Great
81-90 2 Minor, 1 Major, 2 Great
91-100 2 Minor, 2 Major, 2 Great
100+ 3 Minor, 2 Major, 2 Great

" You may spend 1 point to start with the Bloodmark blood ability, which
can be a benefit and a hindrance.=20
" You may spend up to 2 additional points adding minor blood abilities to
your bloodline. Each point spent gets you 1 additional minor ability in
your line. Of course, you cannot use these abilities automatically, your
character must learn to use them during play.
" You may spend 2 points improving a minor ability to a major ability. For
instance, if your DM decided on a 20 point buy for bloodlines, and you
spent 17 points on bloodline score and you have 2 minor abilities (1 extra
purchased for 1 point), you may spend your remaining 2 points to upgrade
one of your minor blood abilities to a major blood ability, giving you
" At the DMs discretion, you may spend 4 points upgrading a major ability
to a great ability. This option is generally only suitable if the DM allows
more than a 20-point bloodline build.

It is important to note: once your bloodline score has been used to
determine the number of blood abilities in your line, IT IS NO LONGER USED
AT THE ADVENTURING LEVEL OF PLAY!! The only thing the bloodline score
determines, from here on out, is how many RP your character can collect by
ruling a domain. This is unchanged from the 2nd edition rules.

At this stage, you have determined your bloodline score, derivation, and
number of blood abilities available in your line. To determine your
bloodline strength, simply compare your bloodline score to the following
table:

Score Strength
None Unblooded
0 Divested
1-13 Tainted
14-22 Minor
23-32 Major
33-64 Great
65+ True

Note: this table is determined using the average scores for various
bloodlines, as described on p. 20 of the original BR rulebook. Tainted is
average 10, Minor is average 17.5, so the cutoff is at 13, etc.

Once your bloodline strength is determined, it can only change at the
discretion of the DM, unless you decide to divest your bloodline, in which
Your bloodline score may increase or decrease during play, but your
strength only changes if the DM decides a change is warranted. For
instance, you may start with a bloodline score of 20 (minor) and through
play, increase it to 40. However, it remains a minor bloodline unless the
DM decides to promote it to major or great.

Optional Rule: Your DM may use the following table to determine ranges for
bloodlines:
Strength Score Range
Tainted 4-16
Minor 5-30
Major 8-48
Great 8-64
True 35+

strength automatically changes to the next highest or lowest category. For
instance, if you have a minor bloodline (26), and during play it increases
to 31, your bloodline strength automatically increases to major. Likewise,
if you have a major bloodline, and your score falls below 8, your bloodline
strength automatically becomes minor.

At this point, your character's bloodline and blood abilities available to
him should be fully fleshed out. Proceed as normal with the character
creation process, choosing feats, classes, skills, and equipment (and

Furthermore, at this point in the process, there should be absolutely no
difference between a scion and a commoner at the adventuring level of play.
Both are exactly the same level, have the same number of experience points
(0 if starting at level 1), have the same attributes (if using a point buy
or discounting luck on dice), and rolled hit points the same way. The only
potential advantage the scion has at the adventuring level of play is the
Bloodmark ability, which may or may not be useful, depending on the
campaign (and exactly what we finally decide its effect is). In any case
the Bloodmark ability alone should not be enough to significantly alter the
balance between a scion and a commoner.

The main difference between the scion and the commoner is that the scion
has a Bloodline score, and can therefore participate at the domain level of
play by collecting regency points. Bloodline score works the same as 2e in
all other ways - you collect RP equal to your bloodline score, you have to
spend RP equal to your bloodline score+1 to raise it by one point, etc,
etc. I don't consider this an imbalance because commoners were never meant
to participate at the domain level of play.

Acquiring Blood Abilities

As we all know, the blood abilities themselves are the kicker when trying
to balance scions versus commoners. In 2e this problem was addressed by
giving commoners a 10% xp bonus. In order to preserve the flavor of 2e as
well as a semblance of balance, some kind of xp penalty should be assessed
against scions.=20

This system requires a scion to pay experience points to learn how to use a
blood ability. By default there is no time requirement; DMs can require you
to spend time to learn your blood abilities, or you can pay xp and
immediately use your blood abilities right after the expenditure of xp.=20

The way this works is that each blood ability is compared to a magical
item. After determining what the blood ability would be like if it were a
magical item, consult the DMG for the item creation costs of that ability.
Since blood abilities don't take up item slots, the x2 multiplier for
"slotless" items should always be used. After taking all modifiers to the
base price into account, divide by 25 (to get the xp cost), which is the
cost of "learning" the blood ability.=20

XP spent in this manner is forever lost, just like XP invested in an item.
If for whatever reason you become unblooded or lose your blood abilities,
that XP is lost, just as if a magical item of yours was lost or destroyed.

Here are a few examples (my conversions for blood abilities are not
necessarily taken from the BRCS doc):

(minor).

Basaia's Heightened Ability (minor) gives a +2 bloodline bonus to
Intelligence. It is a constant effect. Checking the DMG for the price of a
Headband of Intellect +2, we see that it is 4000gp (bonus squared x1000).
Applying the modifier for slotless (x2) we get 8000. The XP cost to make
one is 1/25 the base price, or 320xp in this case. So to "learn" to use
Heightened Ability (minor), you have to spend 320 of your experience
points. Here's an example:

Jimbob is a scion who (using the point buy) has a bloodline of Br, minor,
20. This gives him 2 minor abilities (which can be randomly determined
using the tables on pp. 39-40 of the BRCS draft or chosen by the player, at
the discretion of the DM) one of which is Heightened Ability. Jimbob is
also a level 1 fighter, with 0 experience. Since he has no experience, he
can't "spend" any of it on blood abilities. Therefore, he is exactly equal
to his longtime friend Joe Blow, who is an unblooded commoner, and also a
1st level fighter with 0 xp.

Now let's say each of our heroes gain 2000xp , enough to make them both 2nd
level fighters. At this point Jimbob can choose to "spend" 320 of his
experience points to activate his Heightened Ability (Brenna's dexterity).
He now has 1680 xp and a +2 bloodline bonus to his dexterity score, whereas
Joe Blow has 2000xp.

Now I am aware that this method doesn't match the 10% xp bonus of second
edition. For instance, in our example above Joe Blow is 19% ahead in
experience points. At level 20, his XP advantage would be minuscule. To me
it is not a huge problem, but YMMV. I'd like to hear any ideas about how to
solve this issue.

Heightened Ability scales really well, to Heightened Ability (major)
granting a +4, and great granting a +6. The XP costs would be 1280xp and
2880xp, respectively.

A couple more conversions (I am trying to find different examples that
cause problems in different ways):

Alter Appearance: the scion can cast change self once per day, with caster
level =3D character level. This is problematic because for magical items, th=
e
caster level cost is fixed. For this ability I will assume caster level 10
for price purposes because it is close to the middle (assuming you buy it
at level 1 and keep using it through level 20). Another problem comes to
mind: a blood ability is not spell trigger, command word, or use-activated.
How do you calculate the costs for items that cast a spell simply by force
of will? If someone can point me to the right answer I would be most
appreciative.

Alertness: This counts as a virtual Alertness feat (for the purposes of
prereqs). You get a +2 to spot and listen. This is easy to convert. 4^2 x
20gp x 2 =3D 640gp base price, or an XP cost of 25.6 (round to 25). This is =
a
really cheap blood ability to buy; good thing the system restricts how many
blood abilities you can have! This would be a good case to argue for
converting the gold cost as well. In that case the xp cost would become a
more respectable 153.6.

Resistance, Poison (minor): This ability grants a +4 bloodline bonus to
saves vs poison. This converts really easily as a periapt of proof against
poison, 4000gp base price. XP cost to learn it would be 320xp.

Travel (great): Let's compare this to the Helm of Teleportation. Since
Travel is useable only once a day, and HoT is useable 3/day, so let's
divide the base cost of the helm (48,600) by 3, for a total of 16,200. Now
the helm has no restrictions on its use, but Travel does, so let's just say
that travel is about half as useful, resulting in a divide by 2. However,
since Travel is slotless, we multiply by 2. Still at 16,200. Now divide by
25, and we get an XP cost of 648. A little cheap for something as powerful
as Travel, but I didn't claim this system was perfect. If we use the x6 for
the gold here we get a cost of 3888xp, which sounds more reasonable.

Enhanced Sense (Brenna): This gives the sight and hearing of cats;
according to the BRCS doc, 60ft darkvision and +2 on listen checks. Pretty
close to the goggles of night, which are 8000gp base cost. So we take
(8000gp + (2^2 x 20)) x 2 / 25 for a total of 646.6xp. Think this is about
as powerful as Travel? I doubt it=85 but that's probably more an indication
of the prices for items being out of whack in the DMG.

Unreadable Thoughts: pretty close to the Ring of Mind Shielding. 8000gp
base cost, comes out to 640xp. Seems reasonable for this ability (twice as
useful as Heightened Ability minor).

Obviously this system is far from perfect. We may have to abandon strict
conversions from DMG prices and just assign XP costs to blood abilities. I
don't know yet - I need some feedback, as well as some more time to think.

The system does have several things going for it

1. It puts the CHOICE in the hands of players whether or not to be behind
in XP. It doesn't automatically hamstring scions like the ECL and bloodline
as a 7th ability score systems do. If you want your scion/regent to be just
and just choose not to devote any time to learning how to use your blood
abilities. Overall, pure balance between scions and commoners is preserved
for the purposes of challenge ratings and such, hopefully satisfying one
group of people. At the same time this system makes scions slightly more
powerful in that 1) they have a choice to buy blood abilities, and
versatility is a form of power and 2) they can get access to some "magic
items" in a rare-magic setting, thereby hopefully satisfying the people in
the "scions should be stronger" camp.

2. This is actually 2 different systems. A character can still have a
bloodline without having any blood abilities (in theory). The blood
abilities are what cause the balance of power to shift in favor of the
scions, not the bloodline score itself (which has no impact on
bloodline but use ECLs to determine blood abilities, for example.

3. The XP for bloodline system avoids the mess you get when you use the ECL
for bloodline system, and you have a scion that suddenly loses his
bloodline. Say you have a character with a +2 ECL bloodline who is
character level 11, class level 9 (55,000 xp). What happens if he gets
divested of his bloodline? Do his experience points suddenly fall to 36,000
(level 9)? Does he suddenly get to add new class levels? What happens when
he gets his bloodline back?

ECL for bloodlines is not a robust system because bloodline scores are
generally supposed to vary widely during play. In very few campaigns will

4. The system is also easily houseruled. Again the system gives the
players/DM the choice of enforcing balance among PCs (bloodline point buy,
nobody gets hosed by bad rolls) and allowing the DM to easily adjust the
power level of the campaign (increase/decrease the bloodline buy points).
There's a second choice built in: DMs that liked the randomness of
bloodlines can continue to use the old system without a problem (perhaps
they want to use random for NPCs but point-buy for PCs). NPCs still have
to pay XP costs to learn their blood abilities, just like PCs.

5. It preserves the "spirit" of 2e, by creating a way in which commoners
can be ahead of scions in experience.

6. Assuming we get the XP costs for blood abilities worked out, it will be
very simple to use.

7. The system fully incorporates 3e mechanics at the adventuring level of
play (blood abilities).

8. The system helps alleviate (to some extent) the shortage of magical
items in Cerilia, and the impact that lack of items can have on CRs.

Problems with the system. There are a few I can think of right away:

1. The XP costs for blood abilities may be way out of whack. This isn't a
problem symptomatic of the system; we can easily change the individual
costs of blood abilities without affecting how the system works as a whole.
This is the part that I'll need the most help tweaking, since I don't know
the 3e item creation rules inside and out yet.

2. Scions are effectively getting an item creation feat for free. There's
an easy way to solve this if we do decide it is a problem: require a scion
to take the "blooded scion" feat before he can spend XP on blood abilities.
Blooded scion will essentially function like a specialized item creation
feat that allows you to expend XP to learn blood abilities that are
available to you in your bloodline (predetermined in most cases).

3. The XP penalty for scions, in terms of a percentage, will widely from
the 10% baseline in 2e. The reason is that XP costs for bloodlines are a
flat expediture rather than multiplicative like an XP bonus. I don't see
this as a big deal because in 2e the 10% bonus only really mattered at high
level, and in this system the effect of the XP costs are felt throughout
(since they tend to be larger as a percentage than 10% at the early levels,
which is where most of BR gaming takes place).

Mark_Aurel
03-20-2003, 02:22 PM
That's a fairly good system, IMO. I've tinkered with a similar system myself earlier (for a Planescape campaign, as a way to permanently grant PCs special abilities), and it is also similar to the Prestige Race system from Dragon 304 (the issue whose theme was "mercenaries" that came out around the same time as savage species and contained a lot more about races than mercenaries... just a coincidence) and the Oathbound campaign setting. I like it a lot overall; I actually had a proposal that's similar in some ways to pitch.

There are some things I'd take note of, though - for one, paying experience costs directly can be seen as somewhat similar to an ECL cost; i.e. pay 1000 XP at first level for three blood abilities (say, enhanced ability three times, for instance), and you're behind one level - of course, that doesn't pitch true higher up the levels, but early on, it's a significant cost - and thus a good balancing factor. I can see this system breaking apart somewhat once you hit middle/high levels, though - being a couple thousand xp behind won't matter a lot at that point, but, then again, at that point, depending on the campaign magic item level, neither will blood abilities matter much.

As for your proposal for a point-buy system for bloodlines, I don't think it'd work in the present incarnation. In the original system, bloodlines scaled so that higher bloodlines got more abilities; in your point-buy system, you can buy a lower bloodline and get a higher number of blood abilities. If I've gotten you correctly, that's a bad idea from a balance perspective - you'd essentially have domain-less scions with a bloodline of 2 and 10 minor blood abilities they could eventually acquire, and the opposite purchase pattern would be true of those that wished to rule powerful domains.

This is one of the best alternate proposals I've seen so far, and probably the best overall.

Most blood abilities in your system should be treated as effectively equal to command word items; those that are constant (like heightened ability) should be use-activated.

The XP costs are pretty hard to gauge properly; the costs in the prestige race Dragon article were calculated on a pretty harsh basis; 1/5th of the gp cost of a magic item with the same qualities and no space limitation. For most characters, getting one or two of those abilities would put them behind one level or more.

One final thing to consider about your system proposal is that, logically, you're rendering the distinction between minor/major/great blood abilities obsolete, since their power level is better adjudicated on a basis of pure XP cost.

irdeggman
03-21-2003, 12:25 AM
Please e-mail it to me, irdeggman@cox.net. I've got this "thing" about having to "register" at a group to get to a site (ala yahoo).

DanMcSorley
03-21-2003, 01:16 AM
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, irdeggman wrote:
> Please e-mail it to me, irdeggman@snip. I`ve got this "thing"
> about having to "register" at a group to get to a site (ala yahoo).

As opposed to having to register to vote in the BRCS polls? :)
--
Communication is possible only between equals.
Daniel McSorley- mcsorley@cis.ohio-state.edu

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

AnakinMiller
03-21-2003, 03:18 AM
> Please e-mail it to me, irdeggman@cox.net. I`ve got this "thing" about
having to "register" at a group to get to a site (ala yahoo).

Gosh, Just like those of us who refuse to register with the BR.Net forums to
vote in polls?

I`ve got one major question. I finally sat down and digested the BRCS.

Why in the hell did the domain system turn into a book keeping nightmare?
This is a joke. The old system was not perfect, but I didn`t need a ledger
to track each domain.

When determining Guild RP income, you have to add up your total ranks in 6-8
different skills, compare to another
table to get a percentage. Then take that percentage and multply it by
another number to get the total number of RP you can make a season.

You know the old system was elegant. You made X amount from the total of
start adding unneeded levels of complexity?

Is there any reason that people gain SO few blood abilities now? Hell by
the table in the book a BLD stat of 11 does not entitle you to any Blood
abilities, but in the published material the NPCs under the old 2e with a
score of 22 often had abilities. Is there any reason the design team
descided upon this? Did you really have to find a table in the book to use
for the progression of the aquisition of blood abilities even when it

I had issues with this when I skimmed over it. Now I really despise this.

I pity the PBeM DMs that use this. If you though there was book keeping to
be done before in the old 2e days, you won`t know what hit you when this
comes to town.

-Anakin Miller
-------------------------
"What was sundered, shall be remade.
What was stolen, shall be avenged. "
- Engraved on the Crown of Diemed
>
>
************************************************** **************************
> The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
> Birthright-l Archives:
http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
> To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
> with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

Trevyr
03-21-2003, 03:18 AM
This is a pretty good system, although the kinks in the Xp cost system will
need to be worked out. I`m not entirely sure I like the details of your
point-buy system (for much the same reasons Mark Aurel pointed out) but as
you point out that`s pretty easy to homerule (when did that word become a
verb?).

I might point out that you could further increase the generality of your
system by allowing players to get blood abilities right at the start of even
a first-level game by allowing them to start the game at negative values of
XP. I don`t think there`s anything particularly magic about zero in this
situation.

Mark V.

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

irdeggman
03-21-2003, 04:45 AM
Well as far as registering to vote in the polls. I refuse to count up e-mails and the only way to get a quantifable count is with the poll system. Unfortuneately you have to register to be able to vote. That is just the way the system is. Registering with Yahoo is a completely different animal. It is a company and what the company does with my personal information is a matter that I have no control over. This site is managed by Arjan and he essentially controls what happens with the information I give. I have faith in him.;)

irdeggman
03-21-2003, 04:55 AM
Anakin,
What about GB collections? At least the proposed system is real simple compared to the old one. I don't know how many of us had our own spreadsheets and databases set up to keep track of collections in the old system.

The reason the proposed systtem went to a skill-based approach was due to the relative ease of multi-classing in 3rd edition. There was also much discusion on the site about how a skill-based approach would proabably be best. The task will be to determine how to make it simplier and yet still favor certain classes for certain types of holdings, e.g., fighters should be able to gain mor RP than other classes from Law holdings. The biggest trouble is rogues and the shear number of skill points they get per level.

Remember this was only the first proposal. The skills put out won't be the ones that will end up in the final product - I have no doubt of that. The percentage rate increase was also a means to handle the multi-classing and also give an advantage to characters who choose to emphasize be a regent as opposed to being an adventurer. With skills and feats this is a system that lends itself to this type of evolution and progression - the more you focus on something the better you get.

So if you can come up a better/simplier method please make a proposal we are listening. I'm sure someone can come up something that will account for multi-classing, favor certain classes for certain types of holdings and allow those who choose to focus on being a regent to be better than those who only do it occasionally.([_]

Birthright-L
03-21-2003, 10:59 AM
From: "Atarikid" <atarikid@CHARTER.NET>

> Why in the hell did the domain system turn into a book keeping nightmare?
> This is a joke. The old system was not perfect, but I didn`t need a
ledger
> to track each domain.
>

Hear! Hear! - Bravo!

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

Birthright-L
03-21-2003, 11:19 AM
On top of my head (taking only the time to type and think)

In order to collect any regency at all from a certain type of holding, the
following criteria must be met. There is no partial reward; either you can
collect from a certain type of holding, or you cannot.

Guild:
5 ranks each of Appraise, Bluff, Diplomacy.

Temple:
Divine spellcaster level 2, 5 ranks Diplomacy

Law:
5 ranks of ride skill (all these cultures are ruled by equestrian
partiarchs). +2 BAB.

Source:
Arcane spellcaster level 2. Scry skill 5 ranks.

If we want different level of skill to improve your ability to collect RP, I
suggest all the "5 ranks of skill" requirements be replaced with a
requirement on a number of skill ranks equal to the holding level, and the
BAB and spellcaster level requirement is the holding level -3.

The thing that makes the current system into such a bookkeeping nightmare is
that you get to collect a percentage of the RP depending on your skills.
With this system, you can either collect RP or you cannot - which is much
simpler. Also, if the progressive requirements are used, it means that there
is effectively a limit on how high a holding level you can control,
depending on your level. That makes a lot of sense to me.

/Carl

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

ConjurerDragon
03-21-2003, 02:00 PM
Stephen Starfox wrote:

>On top of my head (taking only the time to type and think)
>
>In order to collect any regency at all from a certain type of holding, the
>following criteria must be met. There is no partial reward; either you can
>collect from a certain type of holding, or you cannot.
>Guild:
>5 ranks each of Appraise, Bluff, Diplomacy.
>Temple:
>Divine spellcaster level 2, 5 ranks Diplomacy
>Law:
>5 ranks of ride skill (all these cultures are ruled by equestrian
>partiarchs). +2 BAB.
>Source:
>Arcane spellcaster level 2. Scry skill 5 ranks.
>If we want different level of skill to improve your ability to collect RP, I
>suggest all the "5 ranks of skill" requirements be replaced with a
>requirement on a number of skill ranks equal to the holding level, and the
>BAB and spellcaster level requirement is the holding level -3.
>
>The thing that makes the current system into such a bookkeeping nightmare is
>that you get to collect a percentage of the RP depending on your skills.
>With this system, you can either collect RP or you cannot - which is much
>simpler. Also, if the progressive requirements are used, it means that there
>is effectively a limit on how high a holding level you can control,
>depending on your level. That makes a lot of sense to me.
>/Carl
>
If you require a fixed amount of skill ranks and start with 5 ranks then
you exclude level 1 characters from ruling or force them to use one of
their feats for skill focus which gives +2.

I would not like that.

Source: Arcane Spellcaster and Scry are things Bards and Magicians can
do also - you have to require a bloodline, too.

The domain level rules were totally independant from the abilitys of the
character in 2E.
To rule that a character reaches a limit about which he canīt collect RP
because his skill is not high enough seems equally wrong - Bloodline is
the limit and skill should only be a factor in how much of your
bloodline you can collect. But to invent a new rule which says that even
with a bloodline of 1000 you collect only say 23 (level 20 +3 skills) RP
is AAARGH. A percentage, yes. A fixed limit based on skills, no.

While we discuss collections based on skill: Why only base RP collection
on skill? 3E uses skills a lot, and GB collection should also be based
on your skills. A guilder who is unable to administrate his guild should
not only be unable to collect full RP but also unable to collect full GB.

And about the excessive multiclassing in 3E: Increase the penalty in 3E
for unbalanced multiclassing from 25% to 75% ;-)
Yes, really I mean that. 2E Birthright allowed all characters only to
have 2 classes, despite dual- and multiclassing allowed more even under
the old rules. 3E Birthright should be as restrictive.
bye
Michael Romes

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

Trevyr
03-21-2003, 04:25 PM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Birthright Roleplaying Game Discussion
> [mailto:BIRTHRIGHT-L@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM]On Behalf Of Stephen Starfox

> In order to collect any regency at all from a certain type of holding, the
> following criteria must be met. There is no partial reward; either you can
> collect from a certain type of holding, or you cannot.
>
> Guild:
> 5 ranks each of Appraise, Bluff, Diplomacy.
>
> Temple:
> Divine spellcaster level 2, 5 ranks Diplomacy
>
> Law:
> 5 ranks of ride skill (all these cultures are ruled by equestrian
> partiarchs). +2 BAB.
>
> Source:
> Arcane spellcaster level 2. Scry skill 5 ranks.

Or perhaps a series of `quasi-skills` or "Realm Skills" that is based on an
average of a set of regular skills, but would have no effect at the
adventure-scale of the game. Characters could then, if they chose, spend
skill points directly on ranks in the quasi-skill, or spend them of ranks of
the underlying skills. You must purchase at least one rank in each of the
regular skills to qualify for the Realm Skills.

Guildcraft [Realm Skill, Int]
Base score would be based on averages of Appraise, Bluff, Diplomacy, Gather
Information and Knowledge(Geography).

Priestcraft [Realm Skill, Wis]
Base score would be based on averages of Diplomacy, Knowledge(Religion), and
Sense Motive.

Magecraft [Realm Skill, Int]
Base score would be based on averages of Spellcraft, Scry, and
Knowledge(Nature). You must also be an arcane (rather than divine) caster.

Statecraft [Realm Skill, Cha]
Base score would be based on averages of Lead, Diplomacy, and
Knowledge(Nobility & Royalty). This skill would deal with both Law holdings
and provinces.

Another benefit of this system is that success of domain actions could be
based on these Realm Skills rather than the individual skills. Thus, for
example, to rule your Guild up one level, the check for the action would
made be using your Guildcraft score. This allows anyone with the relevant
skills to draw RP from that holding type (as long as they spent the
requisite ranks), while still limiting the effectiveness of mulitclassers in
USING those holdings. A Guilder who concentrates on his Guilds will be more
likely to get successes than the priest who dabbles in guilds. If we want to
make the requirement a little more stringent, we could include class-only
skills in one or more of the requirements (assuming they exist...).

Mark V.

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

Arjan
03-21-2003, 04:25 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Romes" <Archmage@T-ONLINE.DE>
> If you require a fixed amount of skill ranks and start with 5 ranks then
> you exclude level 1 characters from ruling or force them to use one of
> their feats for skill focus which gives +2.
>

I dont agree with that, currently my players are all first level players
that rule a holding/province.
They dont care that they cant collect RP right now, and it doesnt stop them
ruling. they still collect the GB.
There are also rules that they get bonus RP on actions for the good of the
domain. So it doesnt mean 1st level characters have to rule without RP.
You should see the smile on there faces when they collected a total of 5RP
through well done actions. :-)
They somehow like the curve of collection RP, so when they advance in level
of Experience, they also advance in there ruling experience (gather more RP)
They havnt complained at all.

Arjan

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

irdeggman
03-21-2003, 04:47 PM
Also in 2nd ed a human (who couldn't multi-class) could dual class in all classes if he had a 17 in the prime ability score for each class. And Birthright was/is a very human-centric campaign setting,meaning that most of the action and intrigue revolves around human-based cultures and not the demi-human ones.:)

Yair
03-22-2003, 09:42 PM
Just a suggestion, since we are using skills why not base RP (or BG for that matter) collection on skill checks?
Use the blood ability modifier instead of the normal ability modifier associated with the skills, to allow those with higher bloodlines to rule more effectively. Perhaps make the roll the number of holding levels you rule effectively, and if you got more holdings you get less RP from the excess. Or something.
I don't like the fact that the system is capped at a level 10 (total) skill. 3E isn't capped, everything just keeps improving. I can unbderstand where your skill is high enough to let you rule a kingdom by taking 10 and still do it effectively, but to use such a strange system instead of the skill mechanics, and on top of that make ruling a holding of with benefit more difficult than getting benefit (=RP) from ruling a domain of 100 holdings[to get 1 RP in a domain of 1 you need a total skill level of 10, which would garner you 100 RP in a 100-holdings domain]... It doesn't feel right.

Backto the original topic - I really do like the idea of basing things on XP, it creates a very balanced mechanics, while still giving em' Kool Powers ™. I am not that crazy over the system to determine initial bloodline, and in particular the option of getting more bloodline abiltiies in return for a LOW bloodline score. I also believe a distingstion needs to be made about the purity of the bloodline (Greater, Major, etc - I find score and strength confusing, purity is more intuitive to me), perhaps they could limit the possible XP costs of the blood abiliites?

dekrass
03-22-2003, 09:51 PM
IMC we've been playing around with the rules a bit to get the effects my players and I would like to see. We used a reverse form of the level based RP collections and reserves variant. To determine maximum collection you double your level and add your bloodline to it, and the maximum reserve is bloodline+level times four. This makes level far more important, which I feel is more in keeping with the concepts of 3E. We also simplified the regency collection based on skills by stating that each rank in a relavant skill gives you 10% regency, and limited guilds to sense motive and bluff.
These changes came from a desire to make high level characters better rulers as my players and I think they should be, to make un-bloodeed rulers (like The Hand of Azrai) possible, and to simplify a little. It just seems to me that a Lv.15 figher should be better at running law holding than his Lv.3 counterpart. I'm sure many will disagree with the idea of changes like this, but it also makes using the domain rules in campaigns other than Birthright alot easier.